The Fellowship of the Ring; I like.

Do not meddle in the affairs of wizards, for they are subtle and quick to anger. (Tolkien 114)

Related image

Like most people who read J.R.R. Tolkien’s 527 page book The Fellowship of the Ring, I went in anything but blind. I had previously seen the big-screen adaptation of Fellowship’, and I had listened to an unfortunately abridged audio reading of the entire series. I have also attempted to read the Fellowship‘ in the past, but have never gotten past the council of Elrond. Finally, I have read Tolkien’s The Hobbit, which takes place some 60 years before Fellowship‘, several times, and enjoyed it very much. But it has been many years since I last picked up Fellowship’, so I thought I would try again.

One of the most immediately striking things about the book is it’s writing; both the quality of the moment-to-moment writing, and structure of the book. The book opens with a prologue, which is not itself unusual. Usually, prologues are used to set the stage for the rest of the book, and to drum up the interest of someone who is casually browsing the book. For this reason, they tend to be self-contained, and written so as to give an exciting taste of the rest of the book. And example of this is Christopher Paolini’s fantasy bestseller Eragon. Putting aside the controversial nature of the book as a whole, its prologue, “Shadow of Fear”, is a perfect example of these traits. At 4 pages, it is short enough that you can comfortably read it while standing in a bookstore. It reveals many of the important aspects of the world of Eragon, such as elves, magic, and other fantasy creatures, and it introduces a potential villain. It is action-packed, and it sets up the single plot point necessary for the rest of the book to progress.

In contrast, the prologue to Fellowship‘ is nearly 20 pages long. It begins by discussing the most important events of The Hobbit, but then diverges into such diverse topics as hobbit genealogy and ethnicities, the history of hobbits and their home-lands, the nature of hobbits, their system of dates, and their preferred type of pipe-weed. From the outset, Fellowship‘ makes itself clear that it is not so much the start of a story as it is a moment of time in a vast world, which has existed and will continue to exist. This style of writing, which prioritizes the world as a whole over the plot, continues throughout the book. It’s a very hit-or-miss style, but for me personally, it’s a big hit.

Putting aside the writing, Fellowship‘ is a worthwhile read for anyone who is interested in the high-fantasy genre, or even fantasy as a whole. Tolkien’s interpretations of fantasy tropes where frequently new at the time, but have since become the norm. For example, different mythologies have involved elves for centuries, with radically different interpretation of personality and physical characteristics. However, Tolkien’s interpretation of the elf has now become the elf, and with the possible exception of Christmas elves, no other type maintains popular recognition. Indeed, Tolkien style elves have now become one of the most common fantasy tropes of all times.

Even excluding issues of influence, I simply enjoyed The Fellowship of the Ring. It was an enjoyable read which went surprisingly fast, and I appreciate the depth that Tolkien put into every detail of his world. I would definitely recommend it.

(567 words)

 

Advertisements

6 thoughts on “The Fellowship of the Ring; I like.

  1. I love LOTR! I appreciate how thorough your review was. I tried reading the book too but stopped at the introduction. Do you think that the movie is a good adaptation of the book?

    Like

  2. I have never read this book but I’ve heard so many good things about it. I don’t think its something I would read 500 is a lot of pages. But I’m glad you enjoyed it.

    Like

  3. Man, I tried really hard to like this one! I really should give it another shot, but I find it really difficult when Tolkien includes the politics of /everything/. Elf politics! Tree politics! Hobbit politics! Flower politics! Oxygen politics!

    But I get that that’s a high-fantasy trope and it’s something I’ll have to overcome. Maybe I’ll give this one another shot!

    Like

  4. That is an old book cover!!! Very cool to have posted an old book cover rather than a new one. I am not sure why, but there is something about old book covers that just look way cooler than the new ones. Any ways, “The Fellowship of the Ring” sounds like a cool read although I’ll have to agree with “thequeensite”, it does seem a little lengthy. I loved all the lord of the rings movies, and enjoy this genre of movies and books so I am sure I would enjoy this book. However I am currently dedicated to the Harry Potter series and as you may know, those books too can get pretty lengthy. Maybe one day. Nice book review!!!

    Like

  5. I’ve recently been doing a lot of research on J.R.R. Tolkien and more specifically the Inklings, a group of Christian literature enthusiast and professors at the University of Oxford during the 1930s and 1940s, for a project. Aside from Tolkien, members of the Inklings included C.S. Lewis and Charles Williams. As a result of working on my project I’ve become very interested in the work of Tolkien and want to begin reading his books soon. I really like your review because of how analytical and articulate it is. Im only more interested in reading Tolkien now, great job!

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s